On 09-Aug-97, Chris Downs wrote to Javier Kohen about Re: inline const;.
 JK>> Why would BC++ 4.51 *sometimes* compile inline int
 JK>> SomeClass:someFunc(void) const; fine, but the linker won't find
 JK>> the "symbol".
 CD> Either you've got no implementation of the function (where is the
 CD> code SomeClass::someFunc()?) or BC is can't handle inline
Yes, there's an implementation...
 CD> functions that are defined in one translation unit and declared in
 CD> a different one.
I have problems only with "inline xxx() const" member functions, if I
comment-out inline or const, it works, but that's not what I want.
Javier Kohen  [The_Crusher] http://jkohen.base.org
... Es medio boludo þ Boludo enano
-!- CrusherTag 0.3.2.
--- Terminate 5.00 UnReg
---------------