| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ACORN |
BK>EC>> (1) the action was unnecessary, BK>RN> Also right. BK> If it was right, why did you become moderator and Cindy Co-mod? You already know the answer to that, so playing dumb to gather supporters here who don't know what happened there is rather futile. BK> And why didn't you just let Lee have the moderator position? I didn't take it away from him. Ask him what happened. Pretend you don't already know. While you're thinking about an answer to that, remember I have emails from Lee and the COFFEE_KLATSCH archive to backup what I say. BK>EC>> (2) Klahn was at fault for starting his paranoid rant and creating BK>EC>> controversy where there was none, and BK>RN> It was at this point that Cindy suggested I claim the BK>RN> echotag and announce myself as moderator, which I did. BK> Which contradicts what Earl said on the subject. And supports my BK> statement that you listed it after I opened the subject. It does no such thing. What Earl wrote is accurate. Is the light blinding you? [...] BK>RN> Or so some thought. My moderating style is as different BK>RN> from Bob's as night is from day. I've been a moderator for BK>RN> a long time now. BK> So have I. And the only real difference is from the nature of BK> the echos. Yours is a general chat, pleasant chat, mine is a BK> debate echo. That's a laugh! I'm referring to personalities and you once again have hit the nail squarely on your thumb. BK>RN> It was he who began the talk about the echo needing a BK>RN> moderator. I was really surprised the echo was still on BK>RN> the backbone without a moderator for so long a time. We BK> Which also surprised me, and contradicts Early again. Again, it does no such thing. BK>RN> (the posters) were perfectly happy to let things go on as BK>RN> they were before the flap about a moderator started. Once BK>RN> that situation stabilized, we began a search for Bobby BK>RN> Queen. Several things came to light about him and I don't BK>RN> know if any of them are correct. BK> I don't even know what they are. I do know the nasties did show BK> up, and left when they realized you were running a strictly BK> friendly chat echo. The few who flamed elsewhere that stayed BK> conducted themselves within the rules. Thanks to you guiding the way into the echo for them. I'm usually amazed at the amount of lemmings in this world, in addition to the insidiousness of the person they will follow. Roger ... Genius is ten percent inspiration and 50% capital gains. --- D'Bridge 3.05* Origin: NCS BBS (1:3828/7) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 140/1 226/0 236/150 249/303 250/306 SEEN-BY: 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 396/45 SEEN-BY: 633/260 267 712/848 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 2905/0 @PATH: 3828/7 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.