JK>> As far as I remember, there was no vote taken regarding the
 JK>> listed participants and this document, and so I believe

 DS>   True, there was no formal vote -- but the list was
 DS> presented and
 DS>   people had the opportunity to decline having their name
 DS> on the list.

Ridiculous... OPT OUT of support for that low quorum trash? I would think
one would have to OPT IN to be on a list of such a nature.  Your method of
compiling that misleading support list is as flawed as the idea of the low
quorum suggested.

 JK>> your statement that all those listed below 'agreed' to
 JK>> _all_ of the changes proposed is misleading.

 DS>   It does not say that those listed agreed to _ALL_ of
 DS> the changes, but

Does it say they support only "parts" of the document, but not
necessarily "all" of it?  It says that the people on the list
support it, which implies they support "all" of it, so, it IS
misleading to somebody who will look at it for the first time, and seems to
be a "trick" to fool people into thinking it is a widely
supported proposal in full by all who participated.  In other words, a
misleading and self serving statement.

Phil

--- FMail/Win32 1.60+