In a message dated 11 Aug 96  09:22:02, L P wrote:
 GW> The questions are in relation to cultivation and
 GW> current laws in California.
 TE> Unfortunately, discussing cultivation would be against
 TE> the rule (thank-you mr. moderator for posting them again)
Well I don't really consider it against the rules - it is a valid topic of 
conversation especially since the CBC bust of a couple days ago. As long as 
we keep the topic related to MEDICAL cultivation vis-a-vis the San Francisco 
situation.
At this point even discussing it improperly could be considered "conspiracy 
to manufacture" or some such other bullshit.
 TE> I'm sure by a technicality we could discuss it's
 TE> cultivation in regards to medicinal benefits
 TE> or such.....
I'm sure to!
 TE> ATTENTION MR. MODERATOR!
 TE> Where would we go to JUST discuss the cultivation of
 TE> Hemp for medicinal or recreational reasons??
Let's discuss it here - but keep it under the MEDICINAL tag - cultivation for 
recreational purposes might be a felony under US Federal law. (Except for 
Billy Boy Clinton snorting cocaine on the Oval Office desk).
 LP> This is the only place to do so that I am aware of.
 LP> Just recheck the rules regarding the recommendation to
 LP> use aliases and the manner in which you might want to
If you feel an alias is something you are comfortable with by all means use 
it - I can understand the paranoia people may have using full real names.
 LP> discuss whatever information you want to discuss.  I
 LP> wouldn't recommend posting anything here in a manner
 LP> that you wouldn't want to express yourself in front of
 LP> the police.  But this shouldn't stop open discussion since
At this point saying bong and bomb in the same sentence will probably get you 
a couple years. But use commen sense and discretion.
--- DLG Pro v1.1u5/PDQMail v2.60
(1:209/245)
---------------