~> ~>>  BK>>  Since you never actually contribute anything,
we can't judge
~> ~>>  BK>>  your abilities.

~> ~>>  JM> Well we can judge your's. They are sorely lacking.

~> ~>>  Yet they are sufficient to actually contribute something.

~> ~>>  BK>>  OTOH, the analysis I posted included thoughts
that escaped you,
~> ~>>  BK>>  now didn't it.

~> ~>>  JM> I didn't waste my time reading your "analysis."

~> ~>>  Ah, then you admit you lied above. If you didn't read it, you
~> ~>>  can't judge it.
 
~>  EC> Were you unable to understand what he wrote?  Or did you
~>  EC> not even try?
 
~>  It's obvious you read just enough to find a basis to twist it.

It is obvious that you read less than that, since your "response" made no
sense.  He said he didn't read your little "analysis" of the quiz.  You
claimed that he had to have read it in order to "judge" it.  First, that is
wrong.  He can look at the "from" field of your posts and predict their
valuelessness based on your long history of valueless posts.  Second, he
didn't say he judged it.  He said he can judge your abilities.  Everyone
can do that except Wilson.


 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a