~>  EC> Your opinion that I "would" is merely a baseless assertion.
 
~>  You have demonstrated, over and over, by your constant
~>  infringments on the rules, and disputing the moderator warnings
~>  when you are called on them.

In truth I have stayed within the rules in your echo.  And I have commented
on your posts which, according to what you just said recently is within
your rules also.

~>  EC> But your claim that I tried is an out and out lie.  And your
~>  EC> claim that I was stopped in my attempt to do so, by some
~>  EC> third party is:

~>  EC> (1) another outright lie.  I have accessed your echo
~>  EC> through several different sysops through the years, and
~>  EC> NONE of them has had to do ANYTHING to "stop" me from
~>  EC> "sabotaging" your or any other echo,
 
~>  You know they would.

You said I had tried to sabotage your echo but could not because of my
sysops,  Now you contradict yourself.  You said I tried but couldn't do it
because of them.  That is a flatout lie.
 
~>  EC> (3) is doubly hypocritical given the fact that I follow the
~>  EC> rules of your echo, while you not only break the rules of
~>  EC> my echo but have on various occasions posted in an echo
~>  EC> where you were banned for life.
 
~>  So have others here

I'm sure you can find some five year olds who would accept that as
reasonable, but it doesn't change my point at all.  You break rules.  I don't.

~>  And I haven't seen your rules posted for a long time.

You have seen every rule posted, including the newest one.

The fact remains that I have not, would not, and could not sabotage your
echo.  Your inability to substantiate any of the three, and your lies about
my sysops having to intervene to stop me, just highlights even more vividly
your paranoid delusions.

By the way, your accusations of lying violate your rules.
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a