~>>  ~>>>  Vern lacks the moral integrity and courage

~>>  BK>       there is nothing there you can call a personal
attack other than
~>> that one line,
 EC>
~>> That's enough to be an attack. You sure as hell wouldn't allow it in your
~>> playground.

 EC> No, it looks like he would!  Bob says he always follows the
 EC> rules of whatever echo he is in.  Bob acknowledged getting
 EC> my post to him many weeks ago, in which I told him the new
 EC> rule for moderators of other echoes.  He has to follow both
 EC> sets of rules in this echo.  Since he pulled in an old feud
 EC> he has from another echo, and since he attacked someone's
 EC> character, Bob is saying that those behaviors are
 EC> permissible under HIS rules for HIS echo.  In the post you
 EC> quoted, Bob is also arguing with a moderator warning in the
 EC> open echo rather than in netmail.

 I do tolerate a limited amount of the last part.

 However, in trying to encourage others to violate the rules in
 my echo you are trying to sabatoge my echo.

 Now you said you were going to make that a rule in your echo,
 but I have not yet seen the rules posted since then.

 Oh, and if you do decide to make that a rule in your echo,
 expect a change in the rules in my echo.

 For that matter, expect a change anyway, about attempts to
 sabatoge the echo. That does need to be done.

 I follow the rules of the echo I am in. If you can't accept
 that, it's your failing.

 Oh, do you reallize how transparent your attempt is to shut down
 those you can't refute, or even respond to intelligently? That
 is your real purpose.



BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a