From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: YourName{at}YourISP.com (Your Name)
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

In article , "Bast"

wrote:
> Your Name wrote:
> > In article ,
> > nyc2001{at}nuttyyahoo.isr wrote:
> >> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:17:08 +1200, YourName{at}YourISP.com (Your Name)
> >> wrote:
> >>> In article ,
> >>> nyc2001{at}nuttyyahoo.isr wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:52:59 -0700 (PDT), Will Dockery
> >>>>  wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 2:07:06 PM UTC-4,
> > wheresou...{at}israels.wars wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You misspelled, "retarded".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I just saw the film a second time, and actually
can't complain.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Looks like a set up for a bit of Managerie and
Search For Spock
> >>>>> (now Search For Pike?).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Spock's mind meld with the dying Admiral pike.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Khan blood being so good for reviving dead characters.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And maybe... Carol Marcus is already pregnant by
the end of the
> >>>>> film?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Some trouble with Tribbles next up?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The debut of Christine Chappel?
> >>>>
> >>>> Whatever, dude.
> >>>>
> >>>> I thought it sucked hickory smoked horse buttholes from a cup.
> >>>>
> >>>> See my review (05-26-13).
> >>>
> >>> Wow! You're being mighty generaous ...
> >>
> >> I'm just that kind of guy.
> >>
> >>> Abrams' so-called "Star Trek" doesn't reach
even those 'heights' of
> >>> quality.
> >>
> >> Hope you didn't pay to see it.
> >
> > Nope. I'll never pay to see Abrams' so-called "Star
Trek" crap and I
> > won't even bother watching it when it eventually plays on one of the
> > free TV channels. I'm dreading the mess the useless moron will probably
> > make of the "Star Wars" franchise too.  :-(
> 
> But saying you will never even watch it, only makes you look silly.
> There are plenty of sources on the web to download copies for free, other 
> than wasting a bit of bandwidth. And then delete it after you watch it.

It would probably take years to download via my dial-up connection with a
limited amount of online time per day.




> I did,...and neither one of the Jar Jar Binks/Abrams Star trek films were 
> keepers, so badly made, they got wiped after one viewing,...dispite the 
> pennies it would have cost in hard drive space to have archived them.
> 
> ....Not even worth the price when they are FREE. 

I've read and seen enough to know Abrams' so-called "Star Trek" movies are
just ill-fitting "reboot" garbage. As above, I won't even waste my time
watching them when they play on a free TV channel.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux