~>  EC> And I told you that you were wrong.  But I went further
~>  EC> than you were able to do, by explaining that she did not
~>  EC> necessarily make a categorical statement about ALL DVDs and
 
~>  Irrelevant since recordable DVDs are the only ones that apply to
~>  a discussion of recording DVDs.

Actually they are called DVD-Rs, not DVDs, and even most of THEM are not
erasable.

~>  EC> Yours, on the other hand, is widespread and indeed
~>  EC> omnipresent.  Did you ASK HER if she meant "all elements of
~>  EC> the set?"  Did you ASK HER if she included DVD-RWs as a
~>  EC> "subset" of DVDs, or whether she considered DVDs to be what
~>  EC> MOST people call DVDs?

You didn't answer, but everyone already knows the answers: no, you didn't;
and no, you didn't.  You ignored what she said, you went off on what she
did not say because you pretended to read her mind to know what she MEANT,
and you never checked to see if that was indeed what she meant.

~>  EC> For DVDs, strictly defined, she was
~>  EC> entirely correct.  For all things that have the letter DVD
~>  EC> somewhere in them, she was mostly correct.  Most of them
~>  EC> cannot be erased.  Either way, your quibble and your
~>  EC> desperate defense of it is hilarious.
 
~>  Your desperate defense of Mimi's low-life attack on Ross would
~>  be hilarious, if it wasn't so nauseating.

I am defending no one and nothing.  I am simply pointing out the
shallowness of your contrived quibble and your endless attempt to stick
with it, and laughing at you anew with each exchange of posts.

 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a