-=> On 12-07-03  12:06,  Janis Kracht <=-
 -=> spoke to Bob Short about Summery <=-

 JK> As far as I remember, there was no vote taken regarding the 
 JK> listed participants and this document, and so I believe 

  True, there was no formal vote -- but the list was presented and
  people had the opportunity to decline having their name on the list.


 JK> your statement that all those listed below 'agreed' to
 JK> _all_ of the changes proposed is misleading.

  It does not say that those listed agreed to _ALL_ of the changes, but
  rather that they agreed to the change in its entirety.  If that was
  not true for you, then a mistake was made.

  For example, some of those listed wanted higher quorum requirements,
  others wanted lower (or no) quorum requirements.  In the end, the
  numbers that were put down were a compromise to which I and others
  agreed as part of the total document for change.

 JK> While I do agree that policy needs to be updated and 
 JK> brought more in touch with reality, I still have  problems 
 JK> with some parts of the presented document, and it is my 

   Then you can certainly make those views known, and I would expect
   that they would receive greater weight than the views of others --
   even though you don't have a vote at this stage (only the RCs do):-}}

 JK> hope, and always has been, that discussions of this
 JK> document will continue either in fidopols, or here in this 
 JK> echo amongst the RCs of Fidonet.

   Fidopols is quiet now -- I'd say this is the appropriate public
   discussion forum for now.

                        dale (at) min (dot) net
                              (1:261/1466)


... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 00:54:04, 09 Dec 2003
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01