RW>RT> While I can't disagree totally with you, it is a fact that
  >RT> cigarette companies DO tailor some of their advertising to
  >RT> target teens and preteens.
RW>And?
And.... advertising WORKS.  Lots of folks making lots of money in the
industry because it WORKS.  Whether _starting_ or _continuing_, teenage
smoking is the problem.  Cigarette companies that encourage it are part
of the problem.
  >reasons that teenagers STARTed smoking.  The fact that
  >rock/movie/sports stars smoke has been shown to have an
  >effect on teenagers STARTing smoking.
Certainly a valid point, but not germane to the issue.  The issue is
whether or not cigarette companies share the responsibility.
RW>Only because they make the product.  Other wise
  >firearms companies are responsible for teens and
  >preteens using their product illegally.  And car
  >companies when they use their product.
Hmmmm... don't remember a firearm company advertising in teen related
publications or using cartoon characters to push their product.  Nor do
I remember firearm companies and automotive companies handing out free
samples.
RW>If the product is dangerous then make it illegal or a
  >controlled drug.  If it isn't then don't blame the
  >manufacture for its use.
I agree with you.  And in the face of all the proof that cigarette
smoking is detrimental to one's health, I don't understand the legality
of it.
Actually, I'm of the opinion that it should be illegal for anyone of any
age... at least in any public place where someone who doesn't want to
participate won't be forced to.
RW>IMNHOP, this is just another attempt for people to duck
  >responsibility and put the blame on someone other then
  >themselves.
Again, I agree with you generally.  But when a company specifically
tailors its merchandising campaigns to a specific market, they must share
the responsibility for the outcome.
---
 * QMPro 1.02 42-7029 * He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
1:135/5.0)
---------------