~> ~>>  I said you are trying to
~> ~>>  sabatoge the echo by turning it into a flame echo.

~>  EC> I have not, would not, and can not do that.
 
~>  You tried, would, and only could not because your access to
~>  Fidonet is through honest people who will stop you.

You are a liar, Bob.

Your opinion that I "would" is merely a baseless assertion.  But your claim
that I tried is an out and out lie.  And your claim that I was stopped in
my attempt to do so, by some third party is:

(1) another outright lie.  I have accessed your echo through several
different sysops through the years, and NONE of them has had to do ANYTHING
to "stop" me from "sabotaging" your or any other echo,

(2) is hypocritical, given the fact that your attempt to hijack my echo WAS
stopped by an honest person, Thom LaCosta, and

(3) is doubly hypocritical given the fact that I follow the rules of your
echo, while you not only break the rules of my echo but have on various
occasions posted in an echo where you were banned for life.  

The fact remains that I have not, would not, and could not sabotage your
echo.  You would, can, and have sabotaged your own echo.  If you wanted to
follow your new rule, you should ban yourself.
  
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a