| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | RE: ACORN |
On 12-16-08, EARL CROASMUN said to BOB KLAHN: EC> That is still paranoid nonsense, just as it was every other EC> time you trotted it out. The only people who can sabotage EC> your echo are (a) you and (b) sysops who carry the echo and EC> who don't enforce moderator rulings. The (b) part hasn't EC> been an issue for several years, so that just leaves (a): EC> you. EC> You have repeatedly assured one and all that you always follow the EC> rules of whatever echo you are in. If that is true, then every post EC> you have made in THIS echo since September 8 has been acceptable EC> under the rules of YOUR echo. You have gone BEYOND simply having EC> abstractly-worded rules, to offer your users operational examples of EC> what is permitted in your echo. EC> But if it is not true, then you owe it to your users to specify what you EC> have posted in THIS echo in the last three months that violates YOUR EC> rules. So, Bob, have you broken any of your rules in the last three EC> months? ~> Which is all concentrated bull shit. EC>That is okay, Bob. NO ONE thought you would actually respond. You just EC>repeat your paranoid rant. ~> You are trying to sabatoge my echo by turning it into a flame ~> echo just like the ones you run. ~> And threatening a moderator for how he moderates his echo is ~> nothing more than extortion. EC>Are you going to threaten someone now? Your delusions are getting out of EC>hand. I've been watching this little drama unfold, and Klahn seems to be losing it. He's becoming shrill-voiced in his echo over being walked on in every thread he gets his superiority complex deflated by someone; he's becoming unballanced in other echoes in threads he's losing his ass in; and now, he's so uptight over his pricked ego he goes out into other echoes looking for anything and everything that could `possibly' be a violation of the rules in *his* echo, makes up a rule about it, and threatens to enforce the rule in `his' echo with vacations and bannings, for something said in another other echo! Geez.....next thing you know, he'll be doing the same thing in Ceppa's echo, and the next time I express my utter contempt for Ceppa in another echo, Klahn will put me on vacation from Ceppa's echo, if not outright ban me. You know.....I've been banned from the echo Klahn moderates since before Peter whats-his-name died. And if I thought there was something I could say or do in another echo or echoes, that would trash out Klahn's echo and turn it into a flame echo.................I'd have probably done it long ago! Same with Ceppa's echo! --- *Durango b301 #PE** Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 34/999 120/228 123/500 140/1 226/0 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 SEEN-BY: 261/100 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 396/45 633/260 267 SEEN-BY: 712/848 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 2905/0 @PATH: 123/140 500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.