Hello Lawrence!

04 Jun 96 21:30, Lawrence Sayre wrote to Darin Mcbride:

 LS> Thanks for the great advice and encouragement!  I guess I should
 LS> have said up front that I'm C/C++ illiterate.  Most of my

GNU, IMO, isn't the easiest to learn from, but it *is* the cheapest.  ;-)
Regardless of the compiler, you will likely need books, so GNU would end up
being cheaper.

 LS> programming has been in the form of Borland's old `Turbo Basic',
 LS> Power Basic, and Quattro Pro macros.  I've done substantial work
 LS> in these three.  I'm also a DOS user since 1982, so the command
 LS> line does not scare me one bit.  With this insight, do you still
 LS> recommend GNU C/C++?

I refuse to recommend - only give pros and cons.  Only you know your
situation well enough to make such a decision; I'll just give you some
information that will aid your decision.

 LS> One respondent suggested that a lack of
 LS> API's (or was that API doc's?) was a major drawback to the use of
 LS> GNU.  Any opinions?

Lack of API docs.  You still have access to the API.

Darin McBride

--- GoldED/2 2.42.G0614