-=> On 12-13-03  14:22,  Peter Knapper <=-
 -=> spoke to Bob Short about Proposal <=-

 PK> As an RC, if I am being asked to consider a revised document, then I
 PK> EXPECT  to see a complete posting of a revised document, NOT a 
 PK> summary,

  Both the summary and the revisions have been published.  The entire
  policy was not published to save space, only the sections which are to
  be changed.

 PK>  AND I expect a copy of that document to arrive via
 PK> the IC. I would expect it to be via Netmail, unless there 

   This is the IC's echo, and where he asked you and the other RCs to
   gather.

 PK> is a common RC only Echo (which I doubt is viable at the
 PK> moment), that Ward could post in. I do not expect to see 
 PK> further discussions of what is about to happen!

   Ward says that there is a RC only echo called REGCON.   If you are
   not connected to that, perhaps you should ask.  As to Ward
   distributing the draft revision again there or in netmail, that is up
   to him.

 PK> Lastly, please be assured, that I WANT to see Policy 
 PK> changed,I WANT the process to work, if only to demonstrate 
 PK> that it is possible, however if people do not follow the 
 PK> process, they may not to see the result they desire, and 
 PK> they MUST realise that they should not point a finger as a 
 PK> result.

  And what do you see as being "the process".   P4 simply says that a
  majority of the RCs request a referendum for a policy change.  Ward
  has now taken the additional pro-active step of asking you and the
  other RCs to this echo where I think he intends to ask you to vote on
  such a request (with the specific draft proposal in mind).

  If you want to filter out the rest of the side talk, that is certainly
  not an unreasonable thing to do.

                        dale (at) min (dot) net
                              (1:261/1466)



... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 00:58:52, 13 Dec 2003
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01