PE> and then gone copy a.pkt+b.pkt c.pkt

AWL> I assure you I haven't done anything like as perverse as use a copy 
AWL> command. Hmmm... I may have had to manually readdress the .pnt packets, as 
AWL> I had a blow up and lost the routing cfg... Why should bink do a 
AWL> concatenation, and does it break anyone elses software?

It should break all mailprocessor software.  You can't just put
garbage characters in the middle of a PKT and expect a mailprocessor
to do some analysis to figure out that you've managed to put another
PKT header in the middle and thus it should skip it.  Check your
PKT before you send it next time and see for yourself.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---