Bill, at 07:24 on Feb 24 1996, you wrote to Paul Edwards ...

BG>> Incidentally, I think it rather incredible that Paul has 
BG>> had two modems which supported V.32ter, 

PE>> The Thunder I had V32terbo disabled for permanently, as it 
PE>> caused too many problems.  The USR I scrapped because it had 
PE>> too many problems for the hefty price of $165.

BG> Your opinion.  Most others disagree though.

BG>> as well as a caller who can use that protocol, yet 

PE>> A caller who supports the non-standard protocol.  Whoopy 
PE>> doo.

BG> As a sysop, you should be catering for as many users as 
BG> possible.  Besides, Dave has no trouble at all with his 4 or 
BG> 5 V.32ter callers.  I notice that you deleted my mentioning 
BG> that V.FC is also a non-standard protocol.

I have a number of callers who connect V.FC too.  I haven't noticed any HST
callers, but someone told me they connected HST once.  HST isn't ITU-T
either, but then I prefer to cater to the wider audience.

David
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq/2 3.10