########## Original       To: RICHARD MATSON
 # CARBON #      was       By: MARK PATRICK
 #  COPY  #   posted:      On: DARKSIDE
 ##########              Conf: 0054 - FIDO:Interna
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday ... April 30, 1996 ... 23:13  EST.

   
         -=> On 04/27/96, RICHARD MATSON wrote to MARK PATRICK <=-

RM> 6N-a3                 this is regular algebraic notation isnt it?
RM> ive been using this for a long time now maybe your referring to long
RM> form let me know if this is not sufficient  rich

   It's not a matter of it being sufficient or not.  The way you
   have been sending the move list can be somewhat confusing.

The way you do it....
 1e4 1c5 2N-f3 2N-c6 3d4 3cxd4 4Nxd44e5 5N-b5

The way I and most others here would show the same moves....
 1.e4 c5  2.Nf3 Nc6  3.d4 cxd4  4.Nxd4 e5  5.Nb5

   You tell me, which is easier to read/decipher?

Regards,
Mark            InterNet   mark.patrick{at}tds.org
                FidoNet    (1:3603/361)




cc: RICHARD MATSON in 96 on DARKSIDE

---
 * RM 1.3 01600 * Thank You for holding your breath while I SMOKE.

--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12