########## Original       To: RICHARD MATSON
 # CARBON #      was       By: MARK PATRICK
 #  COPY  #   posted:      On: DARKSIDE
 ##########              Conf: 0054 - FIDO:Interna
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday ... April 30, 1996 ... 23:09  EST.

   
         -=> On 04/27/96, RICHARD MATSON wrote to MARK PATRICK <=-

   Hi Richard,

       Ok, what's it going to be, 6.Na3 or 6.Nd6+?  I received two
   messages from you in the same day with different moves.

Origin: DOC'S - 0247 - Chess
    To: MARK PATRICK
  From: RICHARD MATSON                Public  
  Date: 04/27/96 at 10:27
    Re: inter-echo match
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 MP> RM> 1e4 1c5 2N-f3 2N-c6 3d4 3cxd4 4Nxd44e5 5N-b5 regards rich
 MP>
 MP> Rich / Mark 1.e4 c5  2.Nf3 Nc6  3.d4 cxd4  4.Nxd4 e5  5.Nb5 a6  6...
 MP> I think we are supposed to use standard algebraic notation.
 MP> Your move.
6N-a3                 this is regular algebraic notation isnt it? ive been
using this for a long time now maybe your referring to long form let me know
if this is not sufficient  rich

-*- TurboEDIT v1.11a [MSP96]

--- ProBoard v2.12 [Reg]


Origin: DOC'S - 0247 - Chess
    To: MARK PATRICK
  From: RICHARD MATSON                Public  
  Date: 04/27/96 at 11:06
    Re: inter-echo match
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1e4 1c5 2N-f3 2N-c6 3d4 3cxd4 4Nxd4 4e5 5N-b5 a6 6N-d6ch 6ifBxd6 7thenQxd6

  if we need long form of notation let me know maybe moderator will see this
and tell whats right thanks rich

-*- TurboEDIT v1.11a [MSP96]

--- ProBoard v2.12 [Reg]




cc: RICHARD MATSON in 96 on DARKSIDE

---
 * RM 1.3 01600 * Heck with Jimmy Carter, send CRUISE MISSILES to Negotiate!

--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12