RN> On Sun 2008-Dec-21 00:19, BOB KLAHN (1:123/140) wrote to
 RN> EARL CROASMUN:

 RN> [...]
 BK>>  And I did plan to give it back, to Alan. Just as I refused the
 BK>> moderator position for coffee klatch. [...]

 RN> When did you do that?

 When Cindy suggested I take it.

 But, you have already seen where Earl confirmed my
 statement. As quoted here. And everything here confirms
 what I said, both Earl's words and yours.

 **************************************************************************
FORUM:   Fido-POL_DISORDER                    HOST: FIDOTEL
DATE:    Dec-22-08 2:17pm                     MSG:  953
FROM:    Roger Nelson
TO:      Earl Croasmun
SUBJECT: RE: ACORN

EC> ~>  BK> Just as I refused the
EC> ~>  BK> moderator position for coffee klatch. [...]

EC> ~> When did you do that?

EC> He didn't.

EC> Back when Bob Klahn and Lee Lofaso were doing their performance of "the
EC> nasties are coming and we need a new moderator" in your echo, someone (I
EC> think it was Cindy) offered several opinions of her own:

That is right.

 ...

EC> (3) IF there was to be such a problem and IF it required a new moderator,
EC> then perhaps someone like Klahn who has already had experience as a
EC> moderator would be an okay pick.

RN> Or so some thought.  My moderating style is as different
RN> from Bob's as night is from day.  I've been a moderator
RN> for a long time now.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 So have I. Though in better behaved echos than this one.
 ----------------------------------------------------------------

 ...

RN> It was he who began the talk about the echo needing a
RN> moderator.  I was really surprised the echo was still on
RN> the backbone without a moderator for so long a time.  We
RN> (the posters) were perfectly happy to let things go on as
RN> they were before the flap about a moderator started.  Once
RN> that situation

 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 IOW, you are saying there was no moderator, which is what I
 said, and Earl falsely claimed there was.
 ----------------------------------------------------------------

RN> stabilized, we began a search for Bobby Queen.  Several
RN> things came to light about him and I don't know if any of
RN> them are correct.

 ----------------------------------------------------------------
 Then why bring them up?

 **************************************************************************

 So, you have now confirmed that I posted the truth, and
 Earl did not.

 Thank you.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... If Jesus was Jewish, why did they give him a Mexican name?
--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]