From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: fakename{at}nomail.invalid
Subject: Re: One woman's opinion



Wiseguy wrote:
> "Daniel47{at}teranews.com"  wrote in
> news:Cxiyt.50039$ny5.21612{at}newsfe24.iad:
>
>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>> http://thisfeliciaday.tumblr.com/post/50858883769/star-trek-movie-
> spoi
>>> lerzzzz
>>>
>> Quote   "and I particularly like some of the secondary characters,
>> Spock was excellent, etc etc" End Quote
>>
>> If Spock was a "secondary character", who were the etc etc
>> characters??
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>
> She didn't say Spock was a secondary character.  She made statements
> concerning why she enjoyed the movie, separated by a comma.
>
> 1.  I particularly like some of the secondary characters.
> 2.  Spock was excellent.
>
> "etc. etc." means other reasons she enjoyed the movie (which
she didn't
> mention) not other characters.
>
> She perhaps could have written it better but it is clear what she meant.





No she is not clear at all. Other than she felt the Female characters were 
weak.
...So even Feminist's didn't like it.

Oh ya and she said,..."It was really noisy ",.....see my comments
about Jar 
Jar Binks/Abrams and gratuitous overdone CGI explosions, to make up for a 
lack of storyline.


--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux