FromTheRafters wrote:

> > Which headers would those be?
> 
> The one where he (you) flat out accused zscaler of spamming.

==============
Subject: Is zscaler known to be a spammer or spam-relay? (because it is)
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 19:26:09 -0400
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email

Return-Path:  

Received:
from qtn1a-out-s6.mail.zscaler.net ([216.218.133.250]) by
my_server.my_domain.tld with ESMTP id AAA183 for
;
Sat, 1 Jun 2013 16:40:05 -0400
================

FromTheRafters  wrote:

> > 216.218.133.250
>
> I see no zscaler in the numbers.

216.218.133.250 = qtn1a-out-s6.mail.zscaler.net

How can you not see zscaler in that?

======================

As far as I can tell, you never did reply to that.

That mail was received directly from 216.218.133.250, which is (as I've
already pointed out) operated by zscaler.

I've been looking at 10's of thousands of spam headers for the past 15
years, so don't god-damn tell me I don't know how to read them.

Instead of being an apologist for zscalar, why don't you go get a clue
and tell me why my server received that spam from them.
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2