19 Mar 12 12:22, mark lewis wrote to Roger Nelson:


 RW>> Nope...this is why I'd rather see you use a dynamic IP rather than a
 RW>> static one. The dynamic DNS look-up never changes, while the static
 RW>> gets lost in the shuffle until you notify every link that you have.
 RN>>
 RN>> I just might do that if more of my friends complain and I'll save
 RN>> myself $15 a month in the process.  (-:

 ml> maybe but not really... unless you find a free static domain name
 ml> service for dynamic IP addresses (yes, there are still some out
 ml> there),

I made a one time contribution to the one I use and got a free lifetime
account with them.

 ml> then you will likely just be respending that $15... i'm using
 ml> a canadian company for my static domain name and they are costing me
 ml> ~$25US a year... so yeah, you'd actually be saving about $120US a
 ml> year :)

If you had made a one time contribution to dyndns.org when it was a
startup, you wouldn't be paying anything for it now.

 ml> why'd that address change?

He moved.


                R\%/itt


  ... Only those who will risk going too far can possibly
  ... find out how far one can go ~ TS Eliot


--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10