19 Mar 12 12:17, mark lewis wrote to Roy Witt:

 RN>> 108.223.123.25

 RN>> Didn't I send that to you?

 RW>> Nope...this is why I'd rather see you use a dynamic IP rather than
 RW>> a static one.

 ml> small terminology correction... what you are actually wanting to say
 ml> is "static domain name for an IP"... static or dynamic IPs can both
 ml> make use of static domain names pointing to them...

Ok, good point.

 RW>> The dynamic DNS look-up never changes, while the

 ml> that should be "the static domain name lookup for an IP never
 ml> changes"...

I meant that it doesn't change as long as the dynamic name is printed in
the nodelist.

 RW>> static gets lost in the shuffle until you notify every link that
 RW>> you have.

 ml> agreed... and it is so easy to do, too...

I may have to make more changes with Roger's link here as well.


                R\%/itt


  ... Only those who will risk going too far can possibly
  ... find out how far one can go ~ TS Eliot


--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10