The 10-03-1997 wrote "David Torrez" :
First, thanks for your awnsers, I appreciate that !
-> - How OO are they. - Is it possible to get the source.
DT> Optima++'s Component Library is EXTREMELY Object Oriented.
DT> Builder's
DT> VCL is also extremely OO, but not as integrated with the IDE as the
DT> OCL (Optima++ Component Library).
Hmm, sorry to ask --- but what do you meen when you say it's EXTREMLY OO,
I meen --- is it a flat structure or wery modular, or somthing else ?
(What make them OO)
Is it easy to get an overview of the librarie, fks. how to to what, or is
the best help the RAD enviroment ?
-> - Is it possible to get the source.
DT> Yeah, to an extent. Powersoft seems to be more witholding than
DT> Borland
DT> in that respect. Optima++ uses a .... Hummm... Don't know the
DT> words
DT> to use... Let's say, their own patented technology to give you
DT> probably the most RAD package out, so they are protective over alot of
DT> aspects.
This sounds like --- in practice NO.
-> - Is it possible to work with the foundation without the visual part
DT> Yes, you can load up the Code Editor in both and hack away your
DT> apps without ever using the Visual aspects.
Ohh, taht sounds good, I like that !
DT> Optima++'s Drag'n'Drop programming, reference cards, and Code
DT> Wizards
DT> are probably the most remarkable things I have seen for C++ (any
DT> language actually).
You find it wery usefull ?
DT> Builder's support for Legacy code like MFC and OWL make it ideal
DT> for those already using those libs and need to support them. I should
DT> not
DT> however, if you are not forced by outside forces (ie. your boss!)
DT> to use
DT> MFC and OWL, then I suggest you use one or the more modern libs,
DT> VCL or OCL. MFC and OWL are the old way of doing things...
I'm not forced by anything by now, but I need some aguments for our
future development (for my boss :-)), and maby CodeBuilder og Optima++
will be considered as worthy platforms, just maby !
Best Regards
Bo Lorentsen
--- Babel v0.15
---------------
* Origin: -=ð Bo Lorentsen ð N‘stved ð Denmark ð=- (2:238/59.22)
|