RT> That fact that you don't eat at a Denny's in Mesa doesn't make a damn
 RT> bit of difference to a Denny's in Boston.  There is no incentive for
 But it does to corporate and the master franchisor in the region.
 RT> Boston to change based on your decision of where to eat.  However, if
 RT> you don't eat at my place, because of a gun ban in Boston, I may just
 RT> say the hell with it, you really don't support me anyway.
 
 If _you_ support _me_ then you'll be putting pressure on the anti
 outlets in your chain and the corporated decision makers.
 RT> It is the right way to go.  If I don't ban in my store, why should I
 RT> be picketed or boycotted the same as those that do?
 
 _If_ the corporate policy is in fact neutral, and it's left up to
 individual units, then okay, I'll go with that.  If OTOH the policy is
 to support the banners then the whole chain is against us, regardless
 of what individual units choose, and therefore the chain is road kill,
 imo.
--- FMail 1.02
---------------