-=> On 12-14-03  08:58,  Peter Knapper <=-
 -=> spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Proposal <=-

 PK> All that has done is evoke MORE discussions amongst the 
 PK> proposers about what should be in the summary document, so 

   Actually, those discussions had far less to do with the content of
   the document than they had to do with the manner in which the list of
   participants was presented.   It is unfortunate that those complaints
   were not posted a year ago when the summary was put before the
   participants for approval.  Nevertheless, I would hope that the
   target group (the RCs) can get past that discussion and focus on the
   content of the replacement policy itself.

 PK> far NONE of what has been posted here is a full replacement
 PK> Policy as required by current Policy (section 8.5).

   It has not been posted in full only because of space considerations.
   What was posted was an easy cut&paste section by section.
   The distinction is minor.
 
 PK> As described in Policy 4 along with the assistance provided 

   That is what is to be done.

 PK> by Ward. Without Ward draging people into this Echo to get
 PK> things moving, NOTHING would have happened.

   Agreed -- he is taking a pro-active step as he had indicated he would
   do at the very beginning, even though P4 does not require him to do
   so.
 
                        dale (at) min (dot) net
                              (1:261/1466)


... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 23:48:29, 13 Dec 2003
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01