Hal, I'm not aware of any Greek disparagement of barbarians; one
of my sources suggested that this perjorative aspect of the term
was Roman useage, expected as they fought many wars with them.
Athenians hired Scythian archers to man their police force. The
main Athenian religious festival, 'Komos' was open to barbarians
as well as Greeks and Romans. It was the earliest example I can
think of, of universal brotherhood; man, woman, master, or slave
made no difference; anyone over four who could understand enough
Greek to know what was going on could be a 'Mystai'.
Herodutus seems to have some fun exposing the hubris of Persians
in their foolish and failed expedition into Scythia. The Greeks
were not at all surprised, and romanticized the 'Noble Savages'.
HW> ancient Hebrews apparently infiltrated into Canaan ca 1200 BCE...
After Ahknaton died, his monotheistic revolution was defeated by
an Egyptian counter revolution, and some of the monotheists fled
with their Goshen governor Moses into the Sinai desert; and, the
insurrections in Caanan showed up 40 years later.
HW> I'm no historian, but didn't the Dorians--who became known as
HW> Greeks--, do likewise around the same time, 1200-1000, BCE.
Not exactly.
HW> And each group rationizes its conquest.
HW> "Aboriginal" culture disappears or is assimilated.
HW> If the Jews
HW> painted a bad picture of their enemies, surely you know how
HW> the Greek generally spoke of "the barbarians."
During the second millennium the Minoans had a naval hegemony all
over the Aegean; IIRC, about 1400 BCE the explosion of a volcano,
and the tidal wave, devastated their navy near Knossos. However,
a number of Greek ports were upwind of the ash and protected by a
penninsula from the tidal wave. They took advantage by revolting
and organizing a fleet to sack Knossus, which also had earthquake
damage to deal with.
Then, after an earthquake hit Troy, they organized another fleet,
and sacked it; but in neither case Hal, whether the Theseus myth,
or Homer's Illiad, will you find the Greek author disparage their
enemy.
HW> -> while in the Greek experience participation in the
HW> -> marketplace and determination by citizens of their political
HW> -> destinies
HW>
HW> This is rather idealized. The "citizens" were males of
HW> an aristocracy. Further, you seem to consider only Athens.
'Tyrant' was not perjorative, but simply meant an usurper of some
king, which *wasn't* done by the aristocracy, but by the plebians
fed up with abuse of power. Although democracies weren't common,
the displacements of power abusers was, and civil rights were not
often or carelessly abused.
There was a critical freedom common to Greeks the Hebrews did not
have: boats. If a Jew was oppressed, he could flee into deserts;
not too appealing. If a Greek was oppressed, he could board with
his family and all his shit, and split to set up on some coast on
which his oppressor had no authority.
By the time the Hebrews got to Caanan, their land had been farmed
for millennia, much of it already treeless scrub. But Greeks had
extensive virgin forest coasts to homestead. For a long time, it
was not homesteading, but plunder. If you look at city locations
from that era, Sparta, Thebes, Athens, Corinth, etc. you may see,
as one writer did, that nobody lived on the coast.
Like America, there was always a frontier to flee to if the power
structure got to be too pushy. As a consequence, the cosmology a
Greek saw on Olympas was Zeus acting like a town mayor; trying to
keep peace between contending parties, and leaving men to run the
lives they had by themselves. Quite a contrast to the tyrannical
Semite deity that you had to kowtow to, or be destroyed [anyway].
___
* OFFLINE 1.58
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------
* Origin: * After F/X * Rochester N.Y. 716-359-1662 (1:2613/415)
|