Rod, at 07:18 on Feb 28 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley...

PE> 2. There is no money-back guarantee

BG> ROFL!  Would they care to try that line with the TPC ?  Call them
BG> back and suggest they have a good look at Sections 72 & 73 of the
BG> Act.  Then watch NetComm shit themselves.  :)

RS> I wouldnt bet on it. When its clearly a problem with a rather
RS> poor line on each end of the session, they can just claim that
RS> the Courier is at fault in that particular situation.

The above Sections relate to "fitness for purpose", and if it can
be shown that Paul's lines are inadequate for the NetComm, it is therefore
unfit for the prupose for which it was originally intended.  I'd expect
that any decent lawyer would get NetComm to refund Paul's money.

Regards, Bill

--- Msgedsq/2 3.20