| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Mainboard-Bulging Ca 2/ |
Greg Easthom wrote in a message to Matt Mc_Carthy: GE> Other manufacturers have been less helpful. As Gary Headlee's GE> capacitor replacement side business grew, he began receiving GE> damaged boards built by other companies besides ABIT. But when he GE> posted the list of other boards on his Web site, he received GE> letters from lawyers representing two manufacturers, prompting him GE> to pull the posting. Why? Is there some misrepresentation of fact going on here? Are the mfrs in question not doing what he says, being reluctant to own up to the problem? I don't personally get too bothered by letters from lawyers. I got a number of them from one locally here some years back, really horrible ones, that were printed in ALL CAPS on what must have been a fairly old printer, with a faded ribbon, and all demanding money that it was claimed that I owed them. So I generated my own form letter in reply, asking for substantiation, and disputing the validity of their claim. After a while this got me one phone call, from some girl in their office who aske me if "I was refusing to pay my debt", and all I had to do was reiterate that I was "disputing the validity of that alleged debt" and that was the end of it... Doing business and responding to tactics meant to intimidate by giving in means that these tactics will continue to be used. And I sure as heck don't want to encourage such folks... GE> Carey Holzman, as a builder of custom PCs, has been trying to raise GE> awareness about the defects since last spring. He thinks GE> manufacturers should be more public about the problem and issue a GE> recall. "Main board replacement is a big job. It's a huge amount of GE> downtime for the user," he says. Failures can also occur after the GE> warranty has expired, he points out. "The manufacturers should do GE> the right thing." Yeah they should. But who is ultimately responsible for this mess? The cap makers, it would appear, if they weren't testing their product enough to find out that it was going to fail... ---* Origin: TANSTAAFL BBS 717-838-8539 (1:270/615) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 270/615 150/220 379/1 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.