Bob, at 09:29 on Feb 24 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley ...

BG>> Why &K9 (supposedly "failsafe" XON/XOFF _and_ CTS/RTS flow
BG>> control) ? I hear that &K3 is considerably more reliable on 
BG>> the NetComm. Perhaps that's why my average transfer rate 
BG>> from Paul this morning was less than 400 cps. :( Oh well, I 
BG>> shouldn't complain. At least it connected that time.

BL> You're loving this, aren't you?

He gets his jollies paying for failed calls.  Bit of a masochist I think. 

David
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq/2 3.10