| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | My last post about the violation ac |
Hello Thomas!
22 Jul 96 10:56, Thomas Seeling wrote to Daniel Lynes:
TS> void foo(int *x) {
TS> int z;
TS> /* this is ok, but senseless */
TS> *x++;
test.c(5): Warning! W302: Expression is only useful for its side effects
TS> /* this is illegal, since x does not contain a "legal" pointer */
TS> z=*x;
However, the compiler does not spit out an error for this; nor, do I see why it
should. Basically you're assigning the value contained in the pointer x, to
the variable, z. Why is this illegal? Did you try compiling it?
When the *x++; is commented out, z=1. When the *x++; is not commented out,
z=71565. However, z I don't believe is guaranteed to be any specific number,
lending to the fact that *x++; is only useful for its side effects. i.e. its
behaviour is unpredictable.
Daniel
internet: dbl{at}eznet.ca
... Children have more need of models than of critics.
--- GoldED/2 2.42.G0615+
* Origin: Enitharmon/2 Beta Home Site 604-527-0195 (1:153/8028)SEEN-BY: 50/99 270/101 620/243 625/100 711/401 409 410 413 430 808 809 934 SEEN-BY: 711/955 712/407 515 624 628 713/888 800/1 @PATH: 153/8028 831 800 270/101 712/515 711/808 934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.