BF> I've been in the habit of dividing documents into sections
BF> when the headers change.  This seemed perfectly normal and
BF> necessary.  Today, I finally discovered that it didn't have
BF> to be.  
BF> The trick?  The "styleref" field code.
This works well for most situations.  However, it doesn't do well in our 
situation.  Our document standard has this layout:
                                        Chapter#
                        This is the heading text
When we tried the styleref code, it picks up the  with the text, 
which is not what we want in the footer.  We've adopted cross references to 
heading text as the standard in our footers.  Its worked well for us.
Bob
--- timEd/2-B11
---------------