On Mon Mar-27-2017 12:11, JIMMY ANDERSON (1:116/18) wrote to ROGER NELSON:

-=> Roger Nelson wrote to JIMMY ANDERSON <=-

 RN> I was disappointed by it.  To me, it lacked the imagination of its
 RN> creator.  I also think they should find someone else to play the role
 RN> of Chekov.

 JA> Yeah - I can see that. I do remember the little 'tribute' to Nimoy
 JA> in there on the death of "old Spock." That was touching.

The only time you miss something is when you no longer have it.

 JA> More of a Star Wars fan, so as long as there is new Star wars
 JA> content that will get my attention. :-)

 RN> I like them both, but without Luke in the movie, it lacks something.

 JA> I disagree, but I respect that opinion. :-) I'm enjoying Rebels and
 JA> I enjoyed Clone Wars as well, so 'Luke" being a part is not a
 JA> prerequisite for me to enjoy it. :-)

Opinions vary.  (-:

 JA> We also play the RPG, and the PC's are the 'stars,' so I'm used to
 JA> the 'big three' not being a part.

 RN> Han Solo being killed by his own son in the movie

 JA> Plot progression. :-)   Was a 'bummer' in that you hate to see a
 JA> loved character die, but people die in most of the Star Wars
 JA> movies. 

Sort of like the red-shirted crewmen in "Star Trek".

 JA> On a related note... Have you seen Rogue One yet?

No.  I did some searching and found two different ones.  One was 3:27 hours
long (must have had a lot of extras) and the other was about 2:10 hours. 
I'm still deciding which one I would want.

 RN>     and then the death of
 RN> Carrie Fisher afterward was a blow to the franchise.

 JA> Can't disagree with that, but the show will go on.

The show MUST go on.

 RN>      I'm now wondering
 RN> where Rey (Daisy Ridley) got her power of the force from.

 JA> It's a common 'wondering' point. :-) But I'm fine with NO SPOILERS
 JA> and to wait and see it unfold...

I'll wait since I have no choice.


Regards,

Roger 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ W10 (1607)