Hello Phil!

Saturday July 06 1996 14:09, Phil Crown wrote to Doug Nazar:

PC> I tried to increase the stack size, but it didn't help.  Grepping the
PC> OWL source shows that it uses 4096 byte stack by default when it calls
PC> _beginthread(), and the only way to increase the stack it is to override
PC> the member function that starts the thread, which I tried, but it didn't
PC> help.

Do you know if Borland's _beginthread() uses the STACK_SPARSE or
STACK_COMMITED flag to DosCreateThread?

PC> I think the problem is that secondary threads are more difficult to
PC> manage under OWL for OS/2.

Sound's that way. Although it could be Borland itself .

PC> IBM's Open Class Library works great. :-)

I know. I've fallen in love with the tracing facility. Now that I've looked
at it it makes so much sense I wish I'd thought of it before.

Doug

--- GoldED/2 2.50+