** Quoting Peter Fitzsimmons to Nicky Morrow:

NM> However, currently there are a lot of good archivers out there.
PF> This I agree with...I don't _want_ an ARJ for OS/2.

I do.

PF> I'm the author of one of the others (lh/2), and even though I use it
  > all the time for my own use, when I release a file for general
  > consupmtion,  I use ZIP.  Why fight it?

That's your decision.  However, that has no bearing on the usefulness of
an OS/2 version of ARJ.  ARJ has many features lacking in other
archivers, and is, by far, the most configurable and flexible archiver
available.  Assuming one needs/wants this configurability/flexibility,
it sure would be nice to have an OS/2 version of ARJ. :)

            --From Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, NY, Sun, 07-28-96--
                --Internet: joe.negron{at}consultant.com--

--- Maximus/2 3.01