RK>On February 18th '97 you wrote to Kevin Gibson:
RK> SA> KG> Hello Steven,
RK> SA>
RK> SA> KG> I'm confused by your messages and I hope you'll help me to
RK> SA> KG> understand what it is you're saying.  First you said: "Don't give
RK> SA> KG> the PC police anymore goofy ideas."  Then you admonished someone 
fo
RK> SA> KG> typing in all caps. It seems like you're at odds with yourself.  
In
RK> SA> KG> another message you said:
RK> SA>
RK> SA>     meaning that if you let The Politically Correct get their way,
RK> SA>     nothing will be fun anymore.  Writing in caps is considered 
shoutin
RK> SA>     in most forums.
RK> SA>
RK> SA> KG> SA>  The price of living in a democratic system where one idea is
RK> SA> KG> SA>  consider right as well as wrong.  Go figure.
RK> SA>
RK> SA> KG> What are you saying?  How does it apply?
RK> SA>
RK> SA>     It's exactly what it means. One train of thought can be 
onsidered
RK> SA>     right and can be considered wrong to an opposing opponent.
RK> SA>
RK> SA>     And demoracy is based on having your own opinion even if no one 
els
RK> SA>     agrees with it.
RK>Let's steer the conversation back to being Disney-related, shall we,
RK>Steven?  8=-)
      Agreed. I'm sending such rantings through Netmail.
---
 þ OLX 2.2 TD þ Intellectual advancement is no substitute for instinct.
---------------