| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: XP Home vs Pro? |
From: Randall Parker Gary, No, you are not alone. I have to have NT, Win2k, and XP available for testing my software on different versions. So I end up configuring all three. I find the differences annoying and I find XP to be the worst. XP's networking settings are especially annoying. Why is the network neighborhood Workgroup name now somewhere else? It is a networking-related name in my mind. Gary Britt wrote: > The very limited experience I have with XP, have been very frustrating. > Everything seems to be in a different place and hidden behind layers of > "assistants" and "help" that make the MS Office paperclip seem like a very > functional slim and trim help system. > > Why does MS continually have to change the names of things and move them > around so experienced users are completely dumbfounded? > > I'm sticking with win98 and Win2K Pro just as long as I possibly can. XP > seems like an awful, strange cartoon interface. > > Am I alone in this thinking? > > Gary > --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.