Hello Joe!

 JN> ARJ has many features lacking in other archivers, and is, by far, 
 JN> the most configurable and flexible archiver available.  Assuming
 JN> one needs/wants this configurability/flexibility, it sure would 
 JN> be nice to have an OS/2 version of ARJ. :)

Concur with your assessment 100% Joe.  In following this thread in the
2 or 3 conferences it is running in...I couldn't help but ask what
arj was written in.  The answer, while not from rj, was C.  Info-Zip
is written in C and the source is freely available...could rj not
do a little "learning" from this code?  Maybe a filesend could be
in order?...


Cheers,

Nicky
Internet: nrmorrow{at}cybertron.com

--- FleetStreet 1.16+