On Mar 04, 1996 at 09:09, Bill Grimsley of 3:640/305.9 wrote:

 BG> Nope, it's a RECOMMENDATION only.  And you can indeed adopt only part of
 BG> that recommendation, and still call it V.34, just as NetComm have done.

I guess what Paul is asking, is what *part* did NetComm adopt (or ignore)? 
Did the ignored parts come under the heading of "Optional"?

 BG> I don't think that's particularly ethical, but in reality, neither is it
 BG> illegal.

It's like the whole SCSI-2, SCSI-3 issue...

    - dave
    d.begley{at}ieee.org

---