From: "Geo."
"Adam Flinton" wrote in message
news:3e08407e{at}w3.nls.net...
> Hohum........why would that be a problem? Oil comes from out of the rock
so
> it would be comparatively easy to seal the whole thing from rock >
pipeline
> > collecting station many miles away (heck they do that 300 ft down under
> the north sea).
You're kidding right? They couldn't even put out the fires last time. Coat
the area with anthrax power and the problem is a whole lot more serious.
Coat it with radioactive dust and it's worse.
> Imagine GWB now w/o 9-11 & with the economy in the skip/the same condition
> it is now. % in favour of him would be low. % in favour of going after
Iraq
> (he would have brought it up w/o 9-11) would have been even smaller.
What makes you think the economy would be in the same condition without
9/11? That was an economic center that was blown up you know.. Why do you
think it was the target, don't you think there are other tall buildings
that would have been a lot easier to hit?
The Administration has tried to cover up just how much of an economic hit 9/11 was.
Geo.
--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/1 633/267
|