JN> That's your decision.  However, that has no bearing on the usefulness of
 JN> an OS/2 version of ARJ.  ARJ has many features lacking in other
 JN> archivers, and is, by far, the most configurable and flexible archiver
 JN> available.  Assuming one needs/wants this configurability/flexibility,
 JN> it sure would be nice to have an OS/2 version of ARJ. :)

Haven't you ever seen RAR?

--- Concord/BW OO1C4OS2 (Reg.)