>> my point of view there really _is_ a need for ARJ/2.
>  Not only that, but ARJ has much better options for spanning disks, and is

RAR is best when spanning discs ;)

>  easier to use for disk spanning than is ZIP.  Besides, InfoZIP's version
>  doesn't do spanning.

I use rar for disc spanning, and so do most of the people I know, ARJ is
dead here.. :)

.tDr.

--- BBBS/2 v3.33 SaMmIk-9