| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Firebird browser |
I guess I'm just not 'getting it'? I now have various DOS browsers including Arachne (the only real GUI browser for DOS). I have LYNX386(DOS), LYNX(Linux), LINKS(both Linux and Windows versions), Netscape v3.x(Linux), Netscape v4.08(w31), Opera v3.62(w31), Mozilla v1.3, Firebird v0.6.1 and Internet Explorer v3.x (w31) and v6 (W2K). If I want speed the LYNX or LINKS browsers being text-only will kick the cr*p out of any GUI browser. I won't bother to compare text-only to the GUI versions. My install of Firebird clocks in at 18.3 meg on an NTFSv5 partition, Mozilla v1.3 clocks in at 26.7 meg on the same partition and Internet Explorer v6 clocks in at 15.7 meg on the same partition. Firebird is 'small'? On my machine loading is fastest using IEx v6, Firebird, and then Mozilla going from fastest to slowest. Browsing with Firebird is marginally faster (I think) but nothing compared to the difference I originally found going from Netscape to Opera v3.62 on my W31 machine. The 'tabbed browsing' seems to dupe what I get in my toolbar at the bottom of my screen which begs the question "por qua?". I guess it avoids opening another instance of Firebird for each URL but with systems having as much memory as we do these days I don't see that as a big deal anymore (Opera v3.62 does this already on my W31 system where I only have 16 meg of memory). My personal homepage has all the search engines I need which means the little search addtion to the toolbar is a zero for me. I don't do 'wholesale' downloading of dozens of files each day and don't need a 'download manager' which also explains why I don't need to reinstall my OS each month. ;-) The default font size is one size smaller than Mozilla uses which gives the impression of 'more display' page, it's not. Mozilla already uses a smaller basefont than IEx uses, more 'sizzle' and less 'steak'? I've also found that neither Mozilla nor Firebird will autostart MIDI music from a webpage and play it in the background. In the process of attempting to remedy this problem discovered a few 'wrinkles' for other plugins/players. Apparently the _unsupported_unofficial_ installer for Firebird will make some needed registry changes for these plugins that won't happen if you just unzip Firebird into a directory as it comes from www.mozilla.org? I find no 'readme' nor other documentation of this stored within the Firebird zip file nor within the installation itself. There is a 'registry.reg' file that will make these changes for you if you look for the solution and stumble onto this information on your own but I'm not certain using a '.reg' patch is recommended for W2K and therefore have not tried it. This information exists on the webpage for the _unsupported_ installer btw. I did look at the data within the '.reg' file and can understand why it is necessary but cannot find documentation for manually entering this information even though the webpage claims there _is_ an explanation how to do this manually? There is an auto-loading javascript named winpref.js at MozillaFireBird>defaults>pref> that controls what versions of plugins Firebird will scan for and use. The scan for Windows Multi-Media Player begins at version 7.0 which is cr*p since many installs of Windows came with version 6.4 of WMMP including W2K! Yes, I changed this per the instructions and no it did not 'fix' the problem of not auto-playing MIDI music from HTML webpages. To use the automated installer appears to obligate us to be using 'beta' releases of Firebird rather than 'stable' release versions. I do not want to be a beta-tester for Mozilla and after reading their requirements just to report a 'bug' don't even want to be bothered to do that either. For many years now Netscape (Mozilla, now Firebird) has been 'interesting' but nothing to celebrate. Their has been a lack of purpose in the directions development has taken and many hurrahs about their 'gecko engine'. Frankly, who cares? I just want a good browser and preferably more than I can get from the default installed Internet Explorer or why bother? Yes, I know we can all run away from the 'script kiddies' and hide behind a less popular browser where they won't be able to hurt us as often but I'd rather kick the cr*p out of the 'script kiddies' and just use the default browser until I find a third party browser that is obviously better. I'm guessing that would be Opera but it's not free and I'm cheap? ;-) > > , , > o/ Charles.Angelich \o , > __o/ > / > USA, MI < \ __\__ ___ * ATP/16bit 2.31 * ... Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. --- Maximus/2 3.01* Origin: COMM Port OS/2 juge.com 204.89.247.1 (281) 980-9671 (1:106/2000) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.