Bob Klahn -> Ed Hulett wrote:

 BK>  ...

 EH>>>> How do you know that picture isn't current? She has already

 BK>  ...

 BK>>>  She didn't say that on the page, nor until just this exchange.

 EH>> So what? It's a picture of her! She shouldn't have to
 EH>> explain how it was taken.

 BK>  Nor does she have a basis for complaint if she doesn't address
 BK>  the point.

She shouldn't have to address the point, moron.

 BK>  ...

 BK>>>  Go back and reread how your lot spun out the DVD thread, to
 BK>>>  absurdity. I said there were rewritable DVDs. Your lot went on
 BK>>>  about how she never said *NOT ALL* DVDs are rewritable, so she
 BK>>>  was right when she said you can't erase and reuse a DVD.

 BK>>>  So, you are the masters of semantic nonsense.

 BK>  You actually have nothing to say about that.

I was too busy laughing.

 EH>>>> You have no clue how recent that picture is. Apparently you
 EH>>>> think she should have been slumped in a wheelchair to make

 BK>  The fact that you referred to her as "slumped in a wheechair"
 BK>  shows your prejudice against the handicapped.

First of all, moron, the correct term is *disabled*.
"Handicapped" is the term used by bigots.

Second, my father was disabled for most of my life and I dealt with bigots
like you on a regular basis. I was also the only one to befriend a local
blind boy when I was in elementary school. All the other children thought
he had cooties or something since he was "different."

So, your silly attempt at insult backfires on you and shows you as the true bigot.

 EH>>>> it represent her current self. Do you think the pictures o
 EH>>>> FDR "standing" were not really FDR?

 BK>>>  ...

 EH>> 

 BK>>>   Once again you have been shown to be a fool and a moron.
 BK>>>   Live with it.

 EH>> 

 BK>  They are mine. You don't have a copyright on them.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Quit whining, child.

 EH>> Yet again you edit my words. You have no shame.

 BK>  Yet again, you post slime. You have no shame.

What slime, moron?

 EH>>>> You are so dishonest that you will edit my words to look
 EH>>>> like they came from you and visa versa.

 BK>>>  It is prefectly acceptable for me to turn your own word against
 BK>>>  you.

 EH>> No it isn't since they do not apply in this situation.

 BK>  Yes it is, yes they do.

Only in your fevered, childish dreams.

 BK>>>  I have every right to say the same to you that you say to
 BK>>>  me. Notice the elipsis? And again, below?

 BK>  ...

You have no originality. Nor do you have any intelligence.

It really must suck being you.

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer

"The republican is the only form of government which is not
eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind."
-- Thomas Jefferson

Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 385029

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)