~>  EC> As I said, I accurately indicated what your involvement
~>  EC> was.  I did not say that you took over the echo.  Lofaso
~>  EC> did that.  I said that you tried to justify it.  And you
 
~>  And just when and how did I try to justify anyone taking over
~>  the echo?

Already answered many times over, Bob!  You did it just as soon as you saw
that Roger's listing had expired.  You started raving that "nasties" were
coming and there had to be a strong moderator to stop them.  Lofaso grabbed
the echo the same day.  Lofaso grabbed the echo on August 12.  Roger Nelson
had been actively participating in the echo right along, other than a week
or so when his computer crashed.  Lofaso even responded to one of his posts
on August 11, without a hint of what he was going to do the next day.

But maybe the most prophetic line was July 23, just a week before the
listing expired.  Roger commented to Lofaso "so far, you have not
offended the moderator."  Lofaso's response to Roger was "Hmmm.  I'm
gonna have to work on that."  And he did.  It was planned.

Funnier still is that Bob made an EARLIER comment about the echo needing
a new moderator, about six months before the August 2007 nastiness.  Six
months?  Hmmm.  Coincidence?

~>  the very listing you posted is dated Jan 2007.

That's right, Bob!!!  And Roger was the moderator.  The listing expired and
then you and Lee jumped into action again.

~>  Lee responded several times that
~>  he should not be moderator. He only elisted it when the
~>  arguement went on so long and he got frustrated with it.

Grossly wrong, Bob!  Lofaso grabbed it BEFORE the argument got rolling, and
in fact before your "the nasties are coming" post had even had time to
fully propagate around fidonet!


 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a