From: "Geo." 

"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.1872f623d24b16e598b1d0{at}news.barkto.com...

> That's not economically viable in an oil field of any size. You're talking
hundreds
> of acres of land. There's not enough anthrax in the world to cause a
significant
> problem.

Less than an ounce contaminated a postoffice and a HUGE building and you
don't think there is enough to contaminate a decent sized chunk of land?

>And "radioactive dust"? Watchoobinsmokin?

it's a brand called beentochernobyllately..

Geo.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4