...

~>>  If you want to play some silly ass game with rules you never
~>>  post, go ahead.

 EC> Your lies are getting more and more delusional.  On the day

 When was the last time you posted the rules? You post your whims
 of individual rules as they suit you one at a time. I don't
 recall you ever posting the rules.

 Which makes you the liar.

 EC> I made the rule I posted it to you and to Ross C, the two
 EC> moderators affected by the rule. Ross liked the rule, and
 EC> has followed it.

 No, he has not. Ross C banned flames, so your pretend rule is
 moot.

 ...

 EC> of it on many occasions.  And it is such a simple rule: all
 EC> you have to do is behave the way that you feel (as
 EC> reflected in your echo rules) people SHOULD behave in
 EC> fidonet.  But you just cannot follow your OWN rules!

 IOW, a Christian who posts in your echo has to behave as a
 Christian, but he is fair game for those who don't want to
 behave as Christians. From the Christian's point of view, that
 would be how he should behave anyway, but that doesn't avoid the
 fact that you are one of the shit who attack the decent person.

 I, OTOH, actually do recognize I fail as a Christian. If Helm
 had ever shown up at my door I would have felt obligated to
 punch him out no matter what.

 I have a long way to go before I am a good Christian.




~>>  Ban me and I'll ban you from my echo for echo sabatoge

 EC> You aren't banned.  You got two weeks for the same
 EC> violation that you gave Sauer two weeks for.  However, now

 And, as I told you, echo sabatoge is a ban. I am not going to
 play your silly ass game. You are banned from the debate echo
 until you drop your attempt at extortion.

 EC> that you compound the offense by adding a direct, quid pro
 EC> quo threat in an attempt to get me to let you break the
 EC> rules of the echo, the two weeks are now doubled to four
 EC> weeks.

 It's not a threat, and it has nothing to do with the rules of
 your echo. You are banned. You are trying to sabatoge my echo,
 and I won't allow it.

 EC> It is hilarious that you think one can "sabotage" an echo

 You are an idiot if you think that line can convince anyone. The
 Stan Hardegree Lap Dog Society may parrot that line if you like,
 but they are all snickering on the side about how you are
 pulling off such a great lie.

 ...

 EC> that a banning offense, but two weeks for your childish
 EC> threat will hopefully be sufficient.

 Your childish behavior has earned you a ban, not a suspension.
 Until you drop your attempt at sabatoging my echo, and the
 extortion that goes with it, you are banned.

 So, take your two weeks or four weeks and shove them.

 EC> Feel free to respond in four weeks, or in another echo.

 There is no other echo I participate in where flames are
 allowed. And I would not carry your crap over to another echo
 anyway. Your echo may be a sewer, but I won't be part of your
 desire to turn other echos into sewers.

 Oh, and I do seem to recall you told me, way back when I first
 learned you were the echo moderator, that threats of legal
 action are against echo rules. So, enforce your rules against
 Stan the sue-er.

 And do try to stop the attacks on me while I am not in the echo.
 That's a good fellow.

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

--- Via Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]