** Quoting Geir_eivind Mork to Joe Negron:

GM> btw: my thougths about ARJ is that it's a out dated
  > archiver, once good enough.

I think it's "outdated" only in that it doesn't have an OS/2 version. :)
 
JN> The need for an ARJ/2 has little to do with disk space (when
  > compared to other archivers which offer superior compression),
  > but more to do with options and features.
GM> the only need I got for arj/2 is to have a arj archiver I can do
  > other things with than unpack.. :) (I have no other os2 arj
  > archivers than an unpacker.

There are a couple of native OS/2 programs which can create ARJ
archives, but they both have major drawbacks.  If you'd like to know
more, message me in ARJ or COMPRESS as we're getting pretty off topic by
now. :)

            --From Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, NY, Sun, 08-04-96--
                --Internet: joe.negron{at}consultant.com--

--- Maximus/2 3.01