Bob Ackley -> TIM RICHARDSON wrote:
 BA> Replying to a message of TIM RICHARDSON to ROSS SAUER:

 TR>> On 01-22-09, ROSS SAUER said to TIM RICHARDSON:

 TR>>> Let me point something out to you;

 TR>>> Right now, America is at war with one of the deadliest enemies it has
 TR>>> ever had.

 RS>>> Wrong, moron.

 RS>>> In 1941, we were actually threatened.

 TR>> You're a real goddamn piece of work...you know that?

 TR>> In 1941 we weren' *threatened*......we were deliberately attacked at
 TR>> Pearl Harbor, losing several capitol war ships, and many lives.

 BA> Obsolete capital ships, BTW.  And we were attacked by a real nation that
 BA> had an army, a navy and an air force.

 TR>> On 9\11 01 we were deliberately attacked, losing the entire
 TR>> twin-towered World Trade Center, A large part of the Pentagon, and
 TR>> probably would have lost the capitol building or White House had a
 TR>> group of courageous passengers on the plane intended for that purpose
 TR>> not acted and forced it down (at the cost of their lives, I might
 TR>> add!).

 BA> The only difference between the four coordinated hijackings of 9/11/2001
 BA> and several hundred other aircraft hijackings over the previous three-plus
 BA> decades is that the hijacked aircraft were flown into buildings, killing
 BA> all
 BA> aboard and many on the ground.

 RS>>> We are at war with at best, a murderous nuisance.

 TR>> You disgusting piece of pig snot! You have the lowlife nerve to
 TR>> trivialize a deliberate attack on American soil, that cost thousands
 TR>> of American lives, by an international group of terrorists acting on
 TR>> the whim of a pigshit-eating raghead who heads an international
 TR>> terrorist army!

 BA> Terrorist gang.  No way that outfit could be considered an army.

 TR>>> An enemy who thinks nothing of severing the head of a victim, `on'
 TR>>> camera, for all the world to see.

 RS>>> So we're supposed to copy them?

 TR>> We're supposed to *WIN*, stupid!

 BA> By any means necessary, regardless of any morality, ethics, standards or
 BA> laws, right?

 TR>>> An enemy who deliberately uses jumbo jets loaded with innocent
 TR>>> passengers as `guided missiles' to fly into sky scraper targets
 TR>>> filled with even more innocent people, and do it for the `numerical'
 TR>>> effect.

 RS>>> And that justifies throwing our morals out the window, and torturing
 RS>>> suspects until they "confess?"

 TR>> Who the hell are *you* (of all people!) to speak of "morals"!

 RS>>> Torquemada(sp?) would be so proud of you...

 TR>>> Nor, I have noticed both from you, and your fuckin' Fido friends,
 TR>>> Klahn, Wilson, Ceppa-hole, or other leftist verbal-bomb tossing
 TR>>> individuals, any condemnation of the religion that comes right out
 TR>>> and demands the death of non-believers!

 BA> Christianity?  "Kill them all, God will know his own" was
said by a high
 BA> authority in the Catholic church.

This argument *MIGHT* hold water *IF* Tim were a Catholic 500 years ago.
AFAIK Tim is not a Catholic. Not all Christians can be judged by the
actions of people who lived hundreds or a thousand years ago.

-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net

http://www.myspace.com/fcpnmimi

St. Gregory, 4th century Bishop of Nanianzus, wrote:
"A little jargon is all that is necessary to impose
on the people. The less they comprehend, the more they admire."

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)